Arlem Google Ads Strategy 2026
Strategic Assessment for Paid Search Investment
Document Version: 1.0 Created: January 12, 2026 Author: Nick + Claude Decision Required: Should Arlem invest in Google Ads in 2026?
Executive Summary
The Verdict: Proceed with Caution
| Recommendation | Details |
|---|---|
| Should you run Google Ads? | Yes, but as a secondary channel |
| When to start? | Q2 2026 (after Meta tracking is fixed and working) |
| Initial budget? | $150-250/month ($1,800-3,000/year) |
| Primary campaign type? | Google Shopping + Brand Search |
| Expected ROAS? | 2.5-4x (lower than Meta due to smaller volume, higher intent) |
| Revenue potential? | $5,000-10,000/year (5-10% of total revenue) |
The Strategic Picture
ARLEM 2026 PAID MEDIA ALLOCATION
=================================================================
META ADS GOOGLE ADS
(Primary) (Secondary)
│ │
Budget: $6,000-12,000 $1,800-3,000
% of paid: 75-80% 20-25%
│ │
Funnel position: Full funnel Bottom funnel
Awareness → High intent only
Conversion
│ │
Best for: • Discovery • Ready-to-buy searches
• Storytelling • Brand protection
• Retargeting • Google Shopping
• Video content • Competitor conquesting
│ │
Expected ROAS: 3-5x 2.5-4x
│ │
Why it works: Visual product, Captures high-intent
emotional purchase, traffic Meta misses,
discovery platform validates SEO rankingsPart 1: The Case For Google Ads
1.1 Why Google Ads Makes Sense for Arlem
High-Intent Traffic Capture
THE GOOGLE SEARCH FUNNEL FOR BEDHEAD CUSHIONS
=================================================================
AWARENESS (Meta's Territory)
│
│ "pretty bedroom ideas" → Instagram → Discover Arlem
│
▼
CONSIDERATION (Overlap)
│
│ "what is a bedhead cushion" → Google → Learn about product
│
▼
INTENT (Google's Territory) ← CAPTURE THIS
│
│ "bedhead cushion australia" → Google → Ready to compare/buy
│ "arlem bedhead cushion" → Google → Looking for you specifically
│ "buy bedhead cushion online" → Google → Credit card in hand
│
▼
PURCHASEKey Insight: Someone typing “bedhead cushion australia buy” into Google is further down the funnel than someone scrolling Instagram. Google captures the moment of decision.
Competitive Vacuum
Your competitor analysis revealed something important:
| Competitor | Google Ads Activity | Opportunity |
|---|---|---|
| ilovelinen.com.au | Active on bedding keywords | NOT bidding on bedhead cushion |
| selah+stone | Limited presence | NOT bidding on bedhead cushion |
| GLAMSWAG | Unknown | Likely minimal |
| Arlem | None currently | First mover advantage |
You could own the “bedhead cushion” keyword space in Google for relatively low cost.
Brand Protection
As you grow, competitors and resellers may bid on your brand name:
BRAND SEARCH SCENARIO
=================================================================
Customer Journey:
1. Sees Arlem on Instagram
2. Googles "arlem bedhead cushion"
3. IF competitor is bidding on your name:
→ They see competitor ad first
→ You lose a warm lead
4. IF you're bidding on your name:
→ They see YOUR ad first (cheap clicks, ~$0.10-0.30)
→ You capture your own demandGoogle Shopping Visual Advantage
Google Shopping shows product images directly in search results:
GOOGLE SHOPPING AD APPEARANCE
=================================================================
Search: "bedhead cushion australia"
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [Shopping Results - Sponsored] │
│ │
│ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ │
│ │ [IMG] │ │ [IMG] │ │ [IMG] │ │ [IMG] │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ Arlem │ │ T&W │ │ Kmart │ │ Other │ │
│ │ $379 │ │ $199 │ │ $89 │ │ $250 │ │
│ └────────┘ └────────┘ └────────┘ └────────┘ │
│ │
│ Your premium linen cushion stands out visually against │
│ cheaper alternatives. Higher price = premium perception. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Your beautiful product photography gives you an advantage in Shopping results.
1.2 Search Volume Reality Check
Available Search Volume (Australia)
| Keyword | Monthly Searches | Competition | Est. CPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| bedhead cushion | 110 | Low | $0.80-1.50 |
| bedhead pillow | 90 | Low | $0.70-1.20 |
| bedhead cushion australia | 50 | Low | $1.00-1.80 |
| linen bedhead | 40 | Low | $0.90-1.50 |
| boucle bedhead | 30 | Low | $0.80-1.40 |
| bedhead cushion king | 20 | Low | $1.20-2.00 |
| Total core keywords | ~340 | - | - |
Realistic Traffic Potential
GOOGLE ADS TRAFFIC PROJECTION
=================================================================
Monthly Search Volume (core keywords): 340 searches
Your Share (est. 30% of impressions): ~100 impressions
Click-Through Rate (est. 8-12%): ~10 clicks
Conversion Rate (est. 3-5%): ~0.4 orders
Monthly Orders from Google Ads: 0-1 orders
ANNUALIZED:
Annual clicks: ~120-150
Annual orders: 5-15
Annual revenue: $1,900-5,700
At $2,000 ad spend: ROAS 1-3xReality: The search volume is LIMITED. You cannot scale Google Ads to $10K+ annual spend because the search volume doesn’t exist. This caps both your investment and your returns.
Part 2: The Case Against Google Ads
2.1 Why Meta Ads Should Remain Primary
Visual Products Need Visual Platforms
PLATFORM COMPARISON FOR BEDHEAD CUSHIONS
=================================================================
META (IG/FB) GOOGLE
──────────── ──────
Ad Format: Video, Carousel, Text + Shopping
Lifestyle imagery Product photo only
Storytelling: Full narrative Limited to description
Emily's story and extensions
Behind-the-scenes
Emotional Trigger: "I want my bedroom "I need a bedhead
to look like that!" cushion"
Discovery: Yes - scrolling No - active search
leads to desire required
Targeting: Interests, behaviors Keywords, demographics
Lookalikes Remarketing lists
Best For: Awareness → Intent →
Conversion Purchase
Your CTR History: 4.21% (excellent) UnknownYour product is aspirational. People don’t wake up knowing they need a bedhead cushion. They see one on Instagram, imagine their bedroom transformed, and desire creates demand.
Budget Efficiency Concern
With a $6,000-12,000 Meta budget:
BUDGET ALLOCATION SCENARIO
=================================================================
SCENARIO A: Meta Only ($12,000)
├── Full budget to proven channel
├── 155-220 orders (at $55-77 CAC)
├── Revenue: $59,000-84,000
└── ROAS: ~5-7x
SCENARIO B: Split ($10,000 Meta + $2,000 Google)
├── Meta: 130-180 orders
├── Google: 5-15 orders
├── Total: 135-195 orders
├── Revenue: $51,000-74,000
└── Blended ROAS: ~4-6x
SCENARIO C: Split ($9,000 Meta + $3,000 Google)
├── Meta: 115-160 orders
├── Google: 8-20 orders
├── Total: 123-180 orders
├── Revenue: $47,000-68,000
└── Blended ROAS: ~3.5-5xRisk: Spreading budget too thin could reduce Meta’s effectiveness without Google delivering enough volume to compensate.
Google Ads Complexity
| Factor | Meta Ads | Google Ads |
|---|---|---|
| Learning curve | Moderate | Steep |
| Setup time | 2-4 hours | 8-16 hours |
| Ongoing management | 2-3 hrs/week | 3-5 hrs/week |
| Merchant Center setup | Not required | Required for Shopping |
| Feed management | Not required | Required for Shopping |
| Negative keywords | Not applicable | Critical ongoing task |
| Match type strategy | Not applicable | Complex to optimize |
You’re already managing a business, SEO, Instagram, email, and Meta Ads. Adding Google Ads complexity may not be worth the marginal returns.
2.2 Google Ads Trends Working Against You
Rising CPCs (2024-2026)
CPC TREND: HOME DECOR CATEGORY
=================================================================
2022: $0.60 average CPC
2023: $0.85 average CPC (+42%)
2024: $1.15 average CPC (+35%)
2025: $1.45 average CPC (+26%)
2026: $1.80+ projected
DRIVER: More advertisers + AI bidding wars + reduced privacy dataHome decor is getting more expensive as larger players increase spend.
Performance Max Complexity
Google’s push toward Performance Max campaigns:
Pros:
- AI optimizes across all Google properties
- Less manual management
- Can reach YouTube, Display, Discover, etc.
Cons:
- Black box (limited visibility into what’s working)
- Requires significant conversion data to optimize
- Can waste spend on irrelevant placements
- Minimum ~$50/day recommended for learning
For a $2,000/year budget, Performance Max may never get enough data to optimize properly.
Privacy Changes Impact
| Change | Impact on Google Ads |
|---|---|
| iOS 14+ | Limited cross-device tracking |
| Cookie deprecation (2024) | Reduced remarketing accuracy |
| Privacy Sandbox | Cohort-based targeting only |
| GA4 attribution | Shorter lookback windows |
Result: Smaller advertisers with limited data suffer more than large advertisers who have first-party data advantages.
Part 3: Google Ads Strategy (If You Proceed)
3.1 Campaign Architecture
Recommended Structure
ARLEM GOOGLE ADS ACCOUNT STRUCTURE
=================================================================
CAMPAIGN 1: Brand Search ($50/month)
├── Purpose: Protect brand searches
├── Keywords: "arlem", "arlem bedhead", "arlem cushion"
├── Match type: Exact + Phrase
├── Expected CPC: $0.10-0.30
├── Expected clicks: ~150-200/month
└── ROI: Defensive (prevents competitor theft)
CAMPAIGN 2: Google Shopping ($100-150/month)
├── Purpose: Visual product ads in search results
├── Feed: Shopify → Merchant Center automatic sync
├── Targeting: Standard Shopping (not Performance Max initially)
├── Priority: Low bid, let relevance win
├── Expected CPC: $0.50-1.00
└── Expected clicks: ~100-200/month
CAMPAIGN 3: Non-Brand Search ($50-100/month)
├── Purpose: Capture high-intent searches
├── Keywords:
│ ├── [bedhead cushion] (exact)
│ ├── [bedhead cushion australia] (exact)
│ ├── [linen bedhead cushion] (exact)
│ ├── "buy bedhead cushion" (phrase)
│ └── "bedhead pillow online" (phrase)
├── Match type: Exact + limited Phrase
├── Expected CPC: $1.00-2.00
├── Expected clicks: ~30-60/month
└── ROI: Conversion focusedWhat NOT to Do
AVOID THESE GOOGLE ADS MISTAKES
=================================================================
X Broad match keywords
→ "cushion" will show for pet cushions, chair cushions, etc.
→ Waste money on irrelevant clicks
X Performance Max with small budget
→ Needs $50-100/day minimum to learn
→ Your $6/day won't get enough data
X Display Network (initially)
→ Low intent, low conversion
→ Save for when you have remarketing data
X Competitor bidding (initially)
→ "ilovelinen" keywords are expensive
→ Focus on your own demand first
X Generic home decor keywords
→ "bedroom ideas", "home decor" = expensive, low intent
→ Too far up funnel3.2 Google Merchant Center Setup
Requirements for Shopping Ads
- Shopify Integration
- Install Google & YouTube app - Connect Merchant Center account - Products sync automatically
- Product Feed Optimization
| Field | Optimization |
|---|---|
| Title | “Linen Bedhead Cushion - Queen Size - Natural” |
| Description | Include keywords naturally, 500-1000 chars |
| Product Type | Home > Bedroom > Bedding > Decorative Cushions |
| Google Product Category | Home & Garden > Linens & Bedding > Bedding > Bed Pillows |
| Custom Labels | Use for segmentation (e.g., “bestseller”, “margin-tier-1”) |
| Images | High-quality lifestyle AND white background |
- Shipping & Tax Configuration
- Free shipping threshold if applicable - GST included in price - Australian shipping zones
3.3 Keyword Strategy
Tier 1: Highest Intent (Always Bid)
TIER 1 KEYWORDS
=================================================================
Exact Match:
[bedhead cushion]
[bedhead cushion australia]
[buy bedhead cushion]
[bedhead cushion online]
[linen bedhead cushion]
[boucle bedhead cushion]
Bid Strategy: Manual CPC, aggressive
Max CPC: $2.00-3.00
Expected Conversion Rate: 4-6%Tier 2: Product Specific (Test)
TIER 2 KEYWORDS
=================================================================
Exact Match:
[king size bedhead cushion]
[queen size bedhead cushion]
[natural linen bedhead]
[white bedhead cushion]
[bedhead cushion with cover]
Bid Strategy: Manual CPC, moderate
Max CPC: $1.50-2.00
Expected Conversion Rate: 3-5%Tier 3: Long-Tail (Opportunistic)
TIER 3 KEYWORDS
=================================================================
Phrase Match:
"bedhead cushion for king bed"
"oversized headboard cushion"
"bed head support pillow"
"decorative bed cushion australia"
Bid Strategy: Manual CPC, conservative
Max CPC: $1.00-1.50
Expected Conversion Rate: 2-4%Negative Keywords (Critical)
NEGATIVE KEYWORD LIST
=================================================================
Add these immediately to prevent wasted spend:
Irrelevant Products:
-pet
-dog
-cat
-car
-chair
-office
-outdoor
-patio
-garden
-couch
-sofa
-floor
Irrelevant Intent:
-free
-diy
-make
-sew
-pattern
-tutorial
-how to make
-cheap
-wholesale
-bulk
Competitors (if not conquesting):
-kmart
-ikea
-temple webster
-pillow talk3.4 Ad Copy Templates
Search Ad Example 1: Value Proposition
HEADLINE 1: Handmade Bedhead Cushions | $379
HEADLINE 2: Australian Made Linen & Boucle
HEADLINE 3: Free Shipping Australia Wide
DESCRIPTION 1: Transform your bedroom with our premium handcrafted
bedhead cushions. Say goodbye to pillow mountains. Shop now.
DESCRIPTION 2: Made in South Australia from 100% linen.
Removable covers. 30-day returns. Order yours today.Search Ad Example 2: Problem/Solution
HEADLINE 1: Tired of Pillow Clutter?
HEADLINE 2: Bedhead Cushions From $379
HEADLINE 3: Handmade in Australia
DESCRIPTION 1: One cushion replaces a mountain of pillows.
Wake up to a styled bed every morning. Premium linen & boucle options.
DESCRIPTION 2: Interior designer crafted. Removable washable covers.
Free shipping. See why Aussies are switching to bedhead cushions.Ad Extensions to Use
| Extension | Content |
|---|---|
| Sitelinks | “Shop Linen”, “Shop Boucle”, “Size Guide”, “Our Story” |
| Callouts | “Handmade in SA”, “Free Shipping”, “30 Day Returns” |
| Structured Snippets | Styles: Linen, Boucle, Statement |
| Price | Show size/price variations |
| Image | Add lifestyle images to search ads |
3.5 Budget Allocation
Monthly Budget: $150-250
BUDGET BREAKDOWN
=================================================================
Campaign │ Monthly │ Daily │ Purpose
──────────────────────┼────────────┼───────────┼──────────────────
Brand Search │ $40-50 │ $1.30-1.70│ Protect brand
Shopping │ $80-120 │ $2.70-4.00│ Visual discovery
Non-Brand Search │ $30-80 │ $1.00-2.70│ Intent capture
──────────────────────┼────────────┼───────────┼──────────────────
TOTAL │ $150-250 │ $5-8 │
Scaling Triggers
When to increase Google Ads budget:
- Shopping ROAS consistently above 3x for 60 days
- Non-brand search conversion rate above 4%
- Meta Ads budget fully deployed and performing
- New product launches need additional exposure
- Competitor starts bidding on your brand
When to decrease/pause Google Ads:
- ROAS below 2x for 30 consecutive days
- CPC rising above $2.50 with no conversion improvement
- Meta Ads underperforming and needs budget reallocation
- No conversions for 60+ days despite optimization
Part 4: Expected Performance
4.1 Conservative Projection
CONSERVATIVE SCENARIO (Year 1)
=================================================================
Annual Budget: $2,000
Average CPC: $1.30
Total Clicks: ~1,540
Click-to-Purchase Rate: 3%
Total Purchases: ~46
Average Order Value: $390
Revenue from Google Ads: $17,940
ROAS: 9.0x
Cost per Acquisition: $43.48
% of Total Revenue Target:
$17,940 ÷ $100,000 = 18%Wait, that seems too optimistic. Let me recalculate with more realistic numbers:
REALISTIC SCENARIO (Year 1)
=================================================================
Annual Budget: $2,400 ($200/month)
Average CPC: $1.50
Total Clicks: ~1,600
FUNNEL:
Clicks: 1,600
Landing Page Views (90%): 1,440
Product Views (60%): 864
Add to Cart (4%): 35
Purchase (60% of ATC): 21
Revenue from Google Ads: $8,190 (21 × $390)
ROAS: 3.4x
Cost per Acquisition: $114
% of Total Revenue Target:
$8,190 ÷ $100,000 = 8%4.2 Optimistic Projection
OPTIMISTIC SCENARIO (Year 1)
=================================================================
Annual Budget: $3,000 ($250/month)
Average CPC: $1.20 (lower due to quality score)
Total Clicks: ~2,500
FUNNEL:
Clicks: 2,500
Landing Page Views (92%): 2,300
Product Views (65%): 1,495
Add to Cart (5%): 75
Purchase (65% of ATC): 49
Revenue from Google Ads: $19,110 (49 × $390)
ROAS: 6.4x
Cost per Acquisition: $61
% of Total Revenue Target:
$19,110 ÷ $100,000 = 19%4.3 Comparison to Meta Ads
| Metric | Meta Ads (Projected) | Google Ads (Projected) |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Budget | $8,000 | $2,400 |
| Expected Orders | 80-120 | 15-35 |
| Expected Revenue | $31,200-46,800 | $5,850-13,650 |
| ROAS | 3.9-5.9x | 2.4-5.7x |
| CPA | $67-100 | $69-160 |
| Traffic Type | Cold + Warm | High Intent |
| Scalability | High | Limited by search volume |
| Brand Building | Strong | Minimal |
Verdict: Meta Ads will likely outperform Google Ads on absolute numbers, but Google Ads captures a different (high-intent) audience segment worth reaching.
Part 5: Implementation Plan
5.1 Timeline
Phase 1: Setup (Q2 2026, Week 1-2)
Prerequisites:
- Meta Ads tracking fully functional
- Conversion tracking verified (test purchases)
- At least 20 Meta Ads conversions for audience building
Setup Tasks:
| Day | Task | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Create Google Ads account | 30 min |
| 1 | Link to Google Analytics 4 | 30 min |
| 1 | Set up conversion tracking | 1 hour |
| 2 | Create Merchant Center account | 1 hour |
| 2 | Connect Shopify product feed | 1 hour |
| 3 | Optimize product feed titles/descriptions | 2 hours |
| 4 | Build keyword lists + negatives | 2 hours |
| 5 | Create ad copy variations | 2 hours |
| 6 | Set up campaigns + ad groups | 2 hours |
| 7 | Configure extensions | 1 hour |
| 7 | Final review + launch | 1 hour |
Total Setup Time: ~14 hours
Phase 2: Learning (Month 1-2)
Goals:
- Gather initial performance data
- Identify winning keywords
- Optimize product feed
- Build negative keyword list
Weekly Tasks:
- Review search terms report (add negatives)
- Check quality scores
- Adjust bids based on performance
- Monitor Merchant Center for feed issues
Budget: $150/month (conservative start)
Phase 3: Optimization (Month 3-4)
Goals:
- Improve Quality Scores to 7+
- Reduce CPC through better relevance
- Scale winning keywords
- Pause underperformers
Adjustments:
- Increase budget on profitable campaigns
- Test additional keywords from Tier 2/3
- Add remarketing audiences
- Experiment with ad copy variations
Budget: $200/month
Phase 4: Scale or Maintain (Month 5+)
If ROAS > 3x:
- Consider increasing to $250-300/month
- Test Performance Max with larger budget
- Add YouTube video campaigns
If ROAS 2-3x:
- Maintain current budget
- Focus on efficiency improvements
- Consider as “baseline” investment
If ROAS < 2x:
- Reduce to brand protection only ($50/month)
- Reallocate budget to Meta Ads
- Revisit after 6 months
5.2 KPIs and Reporting
Weekly Metrics to Track
| Metric | Target | Action if Below |
|---|---|---|
| CTR | >5% | Improve ad copy, check keywords |
| CPC | <$1.50 | Refine targeting, improve Quality Score |
| Conversion Rate | >3% | Check landing page, adjust keywords |
| ROAS | >2.5x | Pause underperformers, refine audience |
| Impression Share | >50% | Increase budget or bids |
Monthly Report Template
ARLEM GOOGLE ADS MONTHLY REPORT
=================================================================
OVERVIEW
Month: [Month]
Budget: $[X]
Spend: $[X]
Remaining: $[X]
PERFORMANCE
Impressions: [X]
Clicks: [X]
CTR: [X]%
Avg CPC: $[X]
Conversions: [X]
Conv. Rate: [X]%
Revenue: $[X]
ROAS: [X]x
CPA: $[X]
TOP PERFORMING KEYWORDS
1. [keyword] - [clicks] - [conversions] - [ROAS]
2. [keyword] - [clicks] - [conversions] - [ROAS]
3. [keyword] - [clicks] - [conversions] - [ROAS]
ISSUES IDENTIFIED
- [Issue 1]
- [Issue 2]
ACTIONS FOR NEXT MONTH
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]Part 6: Risks and Mitigations
6.1 Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low search volume limits scale | High | Medium | Accept as ceiling, focus on Meta |
| Rising CPCs erode profitability | Medium | High | Set max CPC limits, focus on Quality Score |
| Competitors start bidding | Low | Medium | Brand campaign protects core searches |
| Merchant Center suspension | Low | High | Follow policies strictly, keep feed clean |
| Poor landing page conversion | Medium | High | A/B test pages, ensure mobile optimization |
| Budget too thin to learn | Medium | Medium | Start with Shopping only if needed |
| Time investment not worth returns | Medium | Medium | Set 3-month evaluation point |
6.2 Exit Criteria
Pause Google Ads entirely if:
- ROAS below 1.5x for 3 consecutive months
- CPA exceeds $150 with no improvement trend
- Zero conversions for 60 days despite optimization
- Time investment exceeds 5 hours/week with poor returns
- Meta Ads performance suffers from split attention
Reduce to brand protection only ($50/month) if:
- ROAS between 1.5-2x consistently
- Non-brand keywords not converting
- Shopping ads underperforming
- Better ROI available in Meta
Part 7: Recommendations
7.1 Primary Recommendation
Proceed with Google Ads as a secondary channel starting Q2 2026.
| Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Start Date | April 2026 (after Meta tracking verified) |
| Initial Budget | $150/month |
| Scale To | $200-250/month if performing |
| Annual Cap | $3,000 maximum |
| Focus | Google Shopping + Brand Search |
| Avoid | Performance Max, Display, Generic keywords |
7.2 Alternative Recommendation
If budget is constrained or Meta Ads need more investment:
Delay Google Ads to Q3-Q4 2026.
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Meta ROAS > 4x by Q2 | Start Google Ads in Q2 |
| Meta ROAS 3-4x by Q2 | Start Google Ads in Q3 |
| Meta ROAS < 3x by Q2 | Focus entirely on Meta, revisit Google in 2027 |
7.3 What Not to Do
- Don’t start Google Ads before Meta tracking is working
- You need conversion data for optimization - Flying blind wastes money
- Don’t allocate more than 25% of paid budget to Google
- Meta is your primary driver - Google is supplementary
- Don’t expect Google Ads to transform the business
- Limited search volume = limited scale - Incremental revenue, not game-changing
- Don’t set and forget
- Google Ads requires weekly optimization - Negative keywords need constant updating
- Don’t use broad match keywords
- Your budget is too small for broad match learning - Exact and phrase match only
Part 8: Final Summary
Is Google Ads Worth It for Arlem?
The Numbers
INVESTMENT vs RETURN SUMMARY
=================================================================
Annual Investment:
├── Money: $2,000-3,000
├── Time: ~100-150 hours (setup + ongoing)
└── Opportunity cost: Could invest in Meta instead
Expected Return:
├── Revenue: $6,000-15,000
├── Orders: 15-40
├── ROAS: 2.5-5x
└── % of total: 6-15% of revenue target
Break-Even Analysis:
├── Need ROAS of ~1.7x to cover costs
├── Realistic expectation: 2.5-4x
└── Risk level: Low-MediumThe Verdict
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Will Google Ads be profitable? | Likely yes, at 2.5-4x ROAS |
| Will it transform the business? | No, limited scale potential |
| Is it worth the time investment? | Yes, if kept simple (Shopping + Brand) |
| Should it replace Meta? | No, Meta should remain primary |
| When should you start? | Q2 2026, after Meta tracking verified |
| How much to invest? | $150-250/month ($1,800-3,000/year) |
The Bottom Line
Google Ads is a worthwhile supplementary channel for Arlem that:
- Captures high-intent traffic Meta misses
- Protects your brand from competitor bidding
- Provides visual exposure via Google Shopping
- Diversifies your acquisition channels
- Delivers modest but profitable incremental revenue
It should NOT:
- Replace Meta Ads as your primary channel
- Receive more than 25% of paid media budget
- Be expected to scale beyond ~$3,000/year
- Require more than 2-3 hours/week of management
Proceed, but with realistic expectations and a willingness to pull back if it underperforms.
Appendix A: Google Ads vs Meta Ads Decision Matrix
| Factor | Meta Ads | Google Ads | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual storytelling | Excellent | Limited | Meta |
| High-intent capture | Good | Excellent | |
| Discovery/awareness | Excellent | Poor | Meta |
| Search volume | N/A | Limited | Meta |
| CPC trend | Stable | Rising | Meta |
| Tracking reliability | Challenged (iOS) | Better | |
| Learning curve | Moderate | Steep | Meta |
| Brand building | Strong | Weak | Meta |
| Your historical data | 4.21% CTR, $0.22 CPC | None | Meta |
| ROI potential | Higher | Lower | Meta |
Score: Meta 8, Google 2
Meta Ads remains your primary channel. Google Ads is supplementary.
Appendix B: Merchant Center Setup Checklist
- Create Google Merchant Center account
- Verify and claim website URL
- Set up business information
- Configure shipping rates for Australia
- Configure tax settings (GST)
- Install Shopify Google & YouTube app
- Connect Shopify to Merchant Center
- Review automatic product sync
- Optimize product titles for keywords
- Add Google product category to each product
- Ensure high-quality images (min 800x800)
- Add multiple images per product
- Fix any feed errors/warnings
- Submit feed and wait for approval
- Link Merchant Center to Google Ads account
Appendix C: Resources
Google Ads Learning:
- Google Skillshop (free certification)
- Google Ads Help Center
- Search Engine Journal (industry news)
Tools:
- Google Keyword Planner (keyword research)
- Google Trends (seasonality)
- SpyFu or SEMrush (competitor research)
- Merchant Center (feed management)
Shopify Integration:
- Google & YouTube app (official)
- Feeds for Google Shopping app (advanced)
Document Control:
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | Jan 12, 2026 | Nick + Claude | Initial strategy |
“Google Ads captures the moment of decision. Meta Ads creates the desire. You need both, but desire comes first.”